This is the most controversial post I have ever written in ten years of blogging. I wrote it because I was very angry at a specific incident. Not meant as a criticism of feminism, so much as of a certain way of operationalizing feminism.
May When people care enough about something to do it well, those who do it best tend to be far better than everyone else.
You see the same gap between Raymond Chandler and the average writer of detective novels. A top-ranked professional chess player could play ten thousand games against an ordinary club player without losing once.
Like chess or painting or writing novels, making money is a very specialized skill. But for some reason we treat this skill differently. No one complains when a few people surpass all the rest at playing chess or writing novels, but when a few people make more money than the rest, we get editorials saying this is wrong.
The pattern of variation seems no different than for any other skill. What causes people to react so strongly when the skill is making money?
I think there are three reasons we treat making money as different: As far as I can tell, the first is mistaken, the second outdated, and the third empirically false. Could it be that, in a modern democracy, variation in income is actually a sign of health?
It seems to be something that flows from parents. Because of the circumstances in which they encounter it, children tend to misunderstand wealth. They confuse it with money. They think that there is a fixed amount of it.
In fact, wealth is not money. Money is just a convenient way of trading one form of wealth for another.
Wealth is the underlying stuff—the goods and services we buy. You can see wealth—in buildings and streets, in the clothes and the health of the people. Where does wealth come from?
This was easier to grasp when most people lived on farms, and made many of the things they wanted with their own hands. Then you could see in the house, the herds, and the granary the wealth that each family created. It was obvious then too that the wealth of the world was not a fixed quantity that had to be shared out, like slices of a pie.
If you wanted more wealth, you could make it. This is just as true today, though few of us create wealth directly for ourselves except for a few vestigial domestic tasks. Mostly we create wealth for other people in exchange for money, which we then trade for the forms of wealth we want.
The kids see to that. If you want something, you either have to make it, or do something of equivalent value for someone else, in order to get them to give you enough money to buy it. You get paid by doing or making something people want, and those who make more money are often simply better at doing what people want.
Top actors make a lot more money than B-list actors. The B-list actors might be almost as charismatic, but when people go to the theater and look at the list of movies playing, they want that extra oomph that the big stars have.
Doing what people want is not the only way to get money, of course. You could also rob banks, or solicit bribes, or establish a monopoly. Such tricks account for some variation in wealth, and indeed for some of the biggest individual fortunes, but they are not the root cause of variation in income.
In the United States, the CEO of a large public company makes about times as much as the average person.
Microsoft Word is a tyrant of the imagination, a petty, unimaginative, inconsistent dictator that is ill-suited to any creative writer's use. Worse: it is a near-monopolist, dominating the word processing field. Words 2 Pages. Use of Language in A Doll’s House The language that Nora uses changes constantly throughout the play, depending on who she is talking to. When speaking to Helmer, her husband, she adopts a very childish manner and tone. More about Use of Language in A Doll’s House Essay. Doll's House Words | 4 Pages; Review of. Answers to frequently asked questions about Isaac Asimov and his works.
Editorials quote this kind of statistic with horror. But I have no trouble imagining that one person could be times as productive as another. In ancient Rome the price of slaves varied by a factor of 50 depending on their skills. Depends on what you mean by worth. If you mean worth in the sense of what people will pay for their skills, the answer is yes, apparently.Talking to another student while the teacher is trying to teach or trying to finish something important is not good and disrespectful for many reasons, not only to the teacher but also to the rest of the class.
One of the main reasons that talking in class while we are not supposed to is disrespectful is because the teacher is in charge of the class and we are supposed to follow directions correctly.
A basic requirement of any essay assigned in my classes is that it must fulfill the assignment: it must be on the assigned topic (or on one of the assigned topic options), and it must be within a the assigned length limits (a "word essay" in this class means words).
1. Suppose that a two-level supply chain consisting of a consumer electronics manufacturer and a retailer are in the business of selling noise Talk about a common Geriatric age-related change in Osteoporosis What does it mean by "automatic" in the sense of "Automatic fiscal stabilisers.
Just talk about why it is bad and the results of talking in class and what you could possibly miss if you talked in class. You could also talk about why it is a bad thing to do it in class and what the teacher might do if he/she will do if you are caught.
My exasperated pen pal continued, “My essay has around words, and if I cut it down to words, the power of my essay seems to diminish significantly.” Let me be clear: diminished quality is never our goal when we set limits on these questions.
Why I Bought A House In Detroit For $ After college, as my friends left Michigan for better opportunities, I was determined to help fix this broken, chaotic city by building my own home in the.