Millie Popplewell 1 Page Critically outline and discuss the defining characteristics of Islamophobia Islamophobia, while at first appearing a simple concept, on examination quickly reveals a more complex picture. Yet for the purposes of a generalised and straightforward overlook of the issue, we are able roughly to break down the concept into four parts. These are of prejudice, discrimination, exclusion and violence and each acts in conjunction with the other Conway However, in order properly to discuss these characteristics, it is first necessary to discuss a small sample of history and a basic definition of the term.
Local authority responsibilities for sharing information under the Care Act Under the Care Act a local authority must: This relates to the responsibilities of others to comply with requests for information from the safeguarding adults board.
The statutory guidance to the Care Act emphasises the need to share information about safeguarding concerns at an early stage; information-sharing agreements or protocols should be in place.
Designated adult safeguarding managers in the local authority and its partner agencies are responsible for ensuring that information shared about individuals alleged to have caused harm is in accordance with human rights, data protection and confidentiality requirements.
However, the right to confidentiality is not absolute. Sharing relevant information with the right people at the right time is vital to good safeguarding practice. All staff and volunteers should be familiar with their internal safeguarding procedures for raising concerns.
Try to gain consent to share information as necessary. Make sure that others are not put at risk by information being kept confidential: Does the public interest served by disclosure of personal information outweigh the public interest served by protecting confidentiality?
Could your action prevent a serious crime? Record decisions and reasoning about information that is shared.
Carefully consider the risks of sharing information in relation to domestic violence or hate crime. The Caldicott principles The sharing of information in health and social care is guided by the Caldicott principles.
These principles are reflected in the Data Protection Act and are useful to other sectors: Justify the purpose s. Use the minimum personal confidential data necessary for purpose. Access to personal confidential data should be on a strict need-to-know basis.
Everyone with access to personal confidential data should be aware of their responsibilities. Comply with the law. The duty to share information can be as important as the duty to protect patient confidentiality. This is not an absolute right and can be overridden if necessary and in accordance with the law.
Interference must be justified and be for a particular purpose.
CHCCSC Work within a relevant legal and ethical framework Date this document was generated: 27 May Outline of common legal issues relevant to the workplace CHCCSC Work within a relevant legal and ethical framework Date this document was generated: 27 May Course Outline Changes: The information contained in this Course Outline including but not limited to faculty and program information and course description is subject to change without notice. Any changes to course curriculum and/or assessment shall adhere to approved Sheridan protocol. Outline and critically discuss the statutory and common law examples of `lifting the veil` on corporate personality. The corporate veil is a legal concept that separates the company from its shareholders.
Justification could be protection of health, prevention of crime, protection of the rights and freedoms of others. A decision to share information and the reasoning behind it should be recorded.
The basic principles Any personal information should be shared on the basis that it is: If the only person that would suffer if the information is not shared is the subject of that information, and they have mental capacity to make a decision about it, then sharing it may not be justified.
Resources The Information Commissioners Office upholds information rights in the public interest, promoting openness by public bodies and data privacy for individuals. They should use their professional judgement and balance many competing views.
The two-stage functional test of capacity In order to decide whether an individual has the capacity to make a particular decision, you must answer two questions: If so, Stage 2: The Mental Capacity Act states that a person is unable to make their own decision if they cannot do one or more of the following four things: Other considerations Every effort should be made to find ways of communicating with someone before deciding they lack capacity to make a decision.
Family, friends, carers or other professionals should be involved as appropriate.INTRODUCTION TO AUDITING. The practice of auditing existed even in the Vedic period. Historical records show that Egyptians, Greeks and Roman used to get this public account scrutinized by and independent official.
LAW OF LIFE PARTNERSHIPS COURSE GUIDE Lecturer: Mr Ryan McDonald Office: Second floor, Law Clinic provided by the detailed course outline. - Critically discuss recent statutory and case law aimed at harmonising common law principles with Constitutional law principles.
ADVANCED AUDIT AND ASSURANCE 2 (f) Review critically and evaluate those aspects of the client’s accounting system, procedures and internal controls on which he intends to place some reliance; (g) Discuss any weakness in the system with the client in order, inter alia, Where a client has set deadlines for its statutory activities such.
Critically discuss the law governing responsibilities and duties of corporate directors in the public corporations- The thesis will be a comparative study between threes different legal systems, namely English, American, and Saudi Arabian corporate laws. Discuss the fundamental nature of the legal conflict, the public policy issues involved and what you feel the law should be.
Here is an example of a fact situation and a legal analysis. Here is an example of a fact situation and a legal analysis. TORTS OUTLINE NEGLIGENCE (Elements: Duty, Breach, Causation, Scope of Liability, Damages) Duty 1.
General Duty of Reasonable Care a. Imposed on all persons not to place others at foreseeable risk of harm through conduct Statutory Standard of Care (Negligence per se) 1.
Where a statute exists to govern behavior – provides the standard of.